Six Sigma Yellow Belt Certification Practice Exam

Session length

1 / 400

What are 'leading' and 'lagging' indicators in process performance?

Both measure past performance outcomes

Leading indicators reflect past performance, lagging predict future

Leading indicators predict future performance, lagging reflect past

Leading indicators are metrics that help in predicting future performance, by providing insights that allow for proactive measures to be taken. These indicators often consist of activities or processes that can influence the outcomes you wish to achieve, enabling organizations to make informed decisions and adjustments before an outcome is finalized.

In contrast, lagging indicators measure past performance and reflect how well a process has performed based on historical data. They help organizations understand the results of previous actions but do not offer guidance on future performance.

This distinction is crucial for effective process management and continuous improvement, as leading indicators can guide initiatives towards achieving desired outcomes, while lagging indicators serve to assess the effectiveness of those initiatives after the fact. Thus, the correct answer highlights the predictive quality of leading indicators and the retrospective nature of lagging indicators, underscoring their roles in a performance measurement framework.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

Lagging indicators are more important than leading indicators

Next Question
Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy